Now this made me think what is the definition of art?
Is art the "Mona Lisa" Mona Lisa?
Is art "Women Three" Woman Three?
Is art "Balloon Dog" Balloon Dog?
Each of these three pieces are very wildly divergent in appearance yet each are worth in the hundreds of millions of dollars.
So where is the trick?
If each and everyone of these three is classified as some of the world's most expensive art who gets to decide what is, or what is not art?
Even more important who gets to decide what is great art?
Who thinks they are qualified to decide?.
J K Rowling J K Rowling the literary artist of Harry Potter fame, had her manuscript rejected by the first 30 publishers she submitted to and with the 31st publisher who saw it's worth and decided to publish it, became the richest author in the world, her net worth now over a billion dollars.
So ruminating on the subject I think the only people who can decide if art is art, are the people that buy it or want to buy it.
And that the market sets it own price accordingly.
And yes I will answer to my contentious fellow artist "That is exactly what art is, anything anyone wants it t be."
Truth - Mitro |
Balloon Dog - Koons |
Mona Lisa - da Vinci |
Woman Three - de Kooning |