And again underneath each explanation picture is a
clickable link which will take you to a text article,
explaining further.
A good thing to understand about abstract expressionism
is that it is merely expressing a vision, a scene, an
emotion, abstractly.
What I am doing here is for people that might have a
hard time reading the abstraction, I am
making it more real so one has no misinterpretation
what it means.
The only thing I will say though is the
abstract expression is much more powerful in that the
viewer can visualize their own meaning of the painting.
An explanation and example of this is Angel Too -we all
have someone in our life who has passed and whom we
know has become an angel, but that angel to the people
envisioning her is a certain image, a certain color of hair,
a certain body form, so with the abstraction one can
place that personal image of their's into the scene.
So to me the abstract is a much more powerful piece.
 |
| SHARK |
SHARK
 |
| GHOST SHIP |
 |
| SISTERS PLEIADES |
 |
| CIRCUS CIRCUS |
 |
| CIRCUS CIRCUS |
 |
The Montagues and The Capulets, Witches and Warlock Style: A Tale as Old as Shakespeare |
 |
 |
| ALIEN CREATOR AS SMALL CHILD |
 |
 |
| EVERYTHING LOOKS GOOD AFTER A THREE MARTINI LUNCH 3 feet by 4 feet |
H 
Enhanced Story of Angel Too:
 |
| ANGEL TOO This is a very tiny painting I believe 8x10 inches |
ANGEL TOO
She had worn eighty-five years with quiet grace.
Her hands carried the memory of a lifetime—of holding
babies, folding letters, wiping tears, planting flowers,
and reaching for the hands of those she loved. Time had
etched gentle lines across her face, not as marks of age,
but as a map of a life fully lived.
In her final moments, there was no fear.
The room around her softened. The weight of years, of
illness, of earthly burdens began to fall away like
autumn leaves released from a branch. She closed her
eyes as a woman who had finished her journey and
opened them into something entirely new.
She did not awaken with wings.
She did not need them.
Instead, she became light.
A luminous presence, carried effortlessly upon currents
of love and peace. Her silver-white hair streamed behind
her like moonlit clouds. The body that had once grown
tired was now weightless. The heart that had known joy
and sorrow alike now knew only serenity.
She rose through fields of golden radiance, not climbing
but being welcomed. The colors around her seemed alive
—warm amber, soft pearl, blush rose, and hints of
celestial blue—each one singing without sound.
Below her, the world she had known faded gently into
the distance. Above her was not a destination, but a
homecoming.
Her eyes were closed, not because she was asleep, but
because she was listening.
Listening to the voices of those she had loved before her.
Listening to the laughter of eternity.
Listening to the whisper that had called her name since
the day she was born.
And as she moved through the endless light, she smiled.
Not the smile of someone leaving.
The smile of someone arriving.
This is the moment captured in Angel Too—the instant
when an ordinary woman, having completed an
extraordinary life, becomes something more than
mortal.
Not an angel with wings, but an angel in essence: free,
radiant, and forever carried by love.
She is alone in the painting, yet she is not lonely.
She is in flight, yet she is already home.
Now for a bit of bunny rabbit fun with the art scandal of
the century
 |
Here's the case the prosecution laid out but I will let you
the viewers decide :
Looking at these two painting side by
side one has to wonder is this the
classic case of plagiarism that has
plagued artists since the beginning of
time.
On the left you will see a beautiful
painting "The Goldfish "done by Henry
Matisse in the year 1912
below it the painting "Bunny Rabbit on a
Mission" done by Katheleen Mitro in
2015.
Comparing these paintings side by side
Comparing these paintings side by side
we can clearly see goldfish in the
Matisse painting in a cylindrical
crystal vase.
Now incredibly we look at Mitro's painting
and see the same cylindrical crystal
vase which she cleverly tries to disguise
by giving the vase two eyes.
She did not fool this author for one
moment.
Looking closer at her painting, she takes
the same goldfish and again tries to
disguise the similarities with Matisse
by painting only 2 goldfish instead of 4.
Once again her intent to fool falls flat.
Stop the madness.
She goes on to eliminate the Matisse
table.
She uses a totally different color scheme.
Will her tomfoolery never end?
As Matisse painted his painting in 1912
and Mitro in 2015 we know without a
doubt who the plagiarist is here
Post script:
In a very devious ploy to draw attention
away from the plot to copy a
masterpiece, the clever use of inserting
a sweet innocent bunny rabbit by Mitro
must be applauded as a stroke of genius
This is an attempt at humor and all allegations of plagiarism
are totally fabricated. :) - Mitro
This is an attempt at humor and all allegations of plagiarism
are totally fabricated. :) - Mitro
 |
| AMERICA AWAITS WITH BATED BREATH FOR THE END OF FASCISM IN AMERICA This is a large painting 3 ft by 4 ft it hangs vertically |
 |
Diptych : OLD AGE DONE WELL
A. I'M READY FOR MY CLOSE-UP MR DeMILLE
B. BY THE SEA BY THE SEA BY THE BEAUTIFUL SEA
